Compare SEON vs Castle.io

Castle.io is a fraud prevention platform that’s known for its account protection and bot detection options.

We’ll look at how these features compare with SEON’s, to help you decide whether they suit your business needs.

About Castle.io

Formed in 2014, the San Francisco-based Castle.io has accumulated major customers over the years in their roster, including Rockstar Games, DailyPay and Atlassian.

According to the company, the solutions help you gain a better picture about your website customers using its device fingerprinting as well as bot and abuse scores. With a focus on providing companies with real-time analysis, Castle.io sells itself on its ability to detect whole fraud rings near-instantly, using link analysis to spot accounts using the same device, IP or payment method.

These real-time possibilities also extend to allowing users to deploy custom rules, meaning that its customers can work out new parameters on the fly. For companies that want to be able to tailor their fraud defense to their specific needs, but want to analyze and compare the results of their rules quickly, this could be a good option.

Key products

• Device fingerprinting: Castle.io is able to identify devices through robust fingerprinting
• Fraud scoring: Risk-based analysis of resulting data points provide machine learning-based risk scores to stop account takeovers and other abuse
• Bot detection: Bot activity is identified, as well as headless browsers
• Proxy & emulator detection: Spots when customers are using proxies, Tor, emulators, VPNs, and so on
• Email & location quality: Analysis that flags potential abuse and fraud

Pros of Castle.io

• Customers vouch for quick and efficient customer support.
• Highly flexible custom rulesets.
• Openly available documentation on the website. Audit trails available for fraud investigations.

Cons of Castle.io

• Its API requires manual integration through a company’s own front-end code.
• Castle.io lacks tools like customer identity verification for your KYC process.
• Lacks data enrichment tools like reverse phone and email lookup tools.

SEON vs Castle.io Features Comparison Table

Where SEON Wins Over Castle.io

• By employing digital footprinting-focused data enrichment, SEON leverages unique data points in real-time, to flag fraudsters with more accuracy.
• Greater flexibility in pricing, including a free tier – plus, all tiers include a 14-day free trial
• Comes with a Chrome extension to supercharge manual lookups

Where Castle.io Wins Over SEON

• Promises to detect fraud rings instantly, and block them automatically
• Dedicated bot score, abuse score and visualizations make for a sleek interface