Comparison

Compare SEON vs Ekata

Ekata Key Features

A Transaction Risk API provides an overall network, IP, and confidence risk score in under 100 ms tracking data points such as last-seen, emails, location, address and phone numbers.
The Account Opening API is more focused on identity verification, which relies on the Ekata Network and data enrichment to understand who your business is dealing with.
These are available as individual modules also through an Address Risk API and Phone Intelligence API.
Its Pro Insight tool is built especially for manual reviews and all of this is powered by its machine-learning algorithms. The Network Risk feature, derived from the Ekata Identity Network, is designed as a second check to validate identities based on email, IP, or phone data.

Pros of Ekata

Expertise within the ecommerce sector.
Strong emphasis on manual reviews.
Availability of modular solutions to have layered defenses with other companies’ products.
Graph visualization through ‘Ekata Identity Graph’ product.

Cons of Ekata

No social media footprint checks.
Wide range of products can make it confusing to know exactly what you need.
Still largely US-focused, although emerging markets data is increasing.
Opaque pricing.

G2 Comparison

G2 Grid® for Fraud Detection Software

Compare SEON with Ekata for Yourself

SEON’s advanced APIs and device fingerprinting provide fast, scalable fraud prevention solutions, no matter the size or ambition of your organization.

Ask an Expert

Where SEON Wins Over Ekata

Checks social media platforms as part of its risk scoring.
Device fingerprinting designed to spot connections between users and flag scammers.
Combines fraud prevention with compliance tools.
A flexible startup mentality allows for more communication and flexibility.

See How SEON Helps You Grow

See our real-time fraud prevention solution in action, boasting unique digital footprinting, granular reporting, custom risk rules and machine learning.

Ask an Expert